Being humans: anthropological universality and particularity in transdisciplinary perspectives

New York: Walter de Gruyter (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

But what is a man? Shall I say a rational animal? Assuredly not; for it would be necessary forthwith to inquire into what is meant by animal, ...

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,388

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Preface.[author unknown] - 2000 - In Neil Roughley, Being humans: anthropological universality and particularity in transdisciplinary perspectives. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Contents.[author unknown] - 2000 - In Neil Roughley, Being humans: anthropological universality and particularity in transdisciplinary perspectives. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
'What am I?' Descartes and the mind-body problem - reply. [REVIEW]Stephen Yablo - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (3):717-734.
What Am I?: Descartes and the Mind-Body Problem.Joseph Almog - 2001 - New York, US: Oxford University Press.
Toward a Philosophical Anthropology of Nonhuman Animals.Kalpana Seshadri - 2013 - philoSOPHIA: A Journal of Continental Feminism 3 (2):197-206.
Beyond the Anthropological Difference. [REVIEW]Mariana Almeida Pereira - 2021 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies (3):416-420.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
49 (#468,991)

6 months
2 (#1,294,541)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Neil Roughley
University of Duisburg-Essen

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references