More download options

Currents in Contemporary Ethics GINA, the ADA, and Genetic Discrimination in Employment

Mark A. Rothstein

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (4):837-840 (2008) Copy BIBT_EX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Cite

Plain text

BibTeX

Formatted text

Reference Manager

RefWorks

Options

Mark as duplicate

Find it on Scholar

Request removal from index

Revision history

Categories

Genetic Testing in Applied Ethics

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1748-720x.2008.00341.x

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

Upload a copy of this work Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
Configure custom resolver

My notes

Sign in to use this feature

Similar books and articles

Predictive Health Information and Employment Discrimination under the ADA and GINA.Mark A. Rothstein - 2020 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 48 (3):595-602.

Kansas court denies employment discrimination claims under ADA, FMLA, and PDA.B. P. McDonough - 1995 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 24 (3):271-272.

Currents in Contemporary Ethics is GINA Worth the Wait?Mark A. Rothstein - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (1):174-178.

Discrimination and Disability: The Challenges of the ADA.Wendy E. Parmet - 1990 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 18 (4):331-344.

Currents in Contemporary Ethics: Improve Privacy in Research by Eliminating Informed Consent? IOM Report Misses the Mark.Mark A. Rothstein - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (3):507-512.

ADA: Supreme Court disallows disparate impact analysis of facially valid employment procedures.Shaina Walter - 2004 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32 (2):373.

GINA at Ten and the Future of Genetic Nondiscrimination Law.Mark A. Rothstein - 2018 - Hastings Center Report 48 (3):5-7.

Currents in Contemporary Ethics.Mary R. Anderlik & Nanette Elster - 2001 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 29 (1):220-228.

Currents in Contemporary Ethics.Heather Harrell - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (4):846-851.

Currents in Contemporary Ethics.Amy R. Schofield - 2004 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32 (4):777-783.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-07

Downloads
31 (#727,171)

6 months
6 (#856,140)

Historical graph of downloads

How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Returning a Research Participant's Genomic Results to Relatives: Analysis and Recommendations.Susan M. Wolf, Rebecca Branum, Barbara A. Koenig, Gloria M. Petersen, Susan A. Berry, Laura M. Beskow, Mary B. Daly, Conrad V. Fernandez, Robert C. Green, Bonnie S. LeRoy, Noralane M. Lindor, P. Pearl O'Rourke, Carmen Radecki Breitkopf, Mark A. Rothstein, Brian Van Ness & Benjamin S. Wilfond - 2015 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (3):440-463.

The Use of Genetic Testing Information in the Insurance Industry: An Ethical and Societal Analysis of Public Policy Options.Paul Thistle, Gene Laczniak & Alexander Nill - 2019 - Journal of Business Ethics 156 (1):105-121.

Genes wide open: Data sharing and the social gradient of genomic privacy.Tobias Haeusermann, Marta Fadda, Alessandro Blasimme, Bastian Greshake Tzovaras & Effy Vayena - forthcoming - AJOB Empirical Bioethics:1-15.

Currents in Contemporary Bioethics.Mark A. Rothstein - 2012 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (2):394-400.

Biobanking Research and Privacy Laws in the United States.Heather L. Harrell & Mark A. Rothstein - 2016 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 44 (1):106-127.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Currents in Contemporary Ethics is GINA Worth the Wait?Mark A. Rothstein - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (1):174-178.

Add more references