Re-visioning Clinical Research: Gender and the Ethics of Experimental Design

Hypatia 4 (2):125-139 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Since modern medicine is based substantially in clinical medical research, the flaws and ethical problems that arise in this research as it is conceived and practiced in the United States are likely to be reflected to some extent in current medicine and its practice. This paper explores some of the ways in which clinical research has suffered from an androcentric focus in its choice and definition of problems studied, approaches and methods used in design and interpretation of experiments, and theories and conclusions drawn from the research. Some examples of re-visioned research hint at solutions to the ethical dilemmas created by this biased focus; an increased number of feminists involved in clinical research may provide avenues for additional changes that would lead to improved health care for all.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,597

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
83 (#253,371)

6 months
8 (#597,840)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Ethics and regulation of clinical research.Robert J. Levine - 1986 - Baltimore: Urban & Schwarzenberg.
The Science Question in Feminism.Sandra Harding - 1988 - Synthese 76 (3):441-446.
Feminist approaches to science.Ruth Bleier (ed.) - 1986 - New York: Pergamon Press.
Feminism and science.Evelyn Fox Keller & Helen E. Longino (eds.) - 1996 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 13 references / Add more references