Disclosing misattributed paternity

Bioethics 10 (2):114–130 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACTIn 1994, the Committee on Assessing Genetic Risks of the Institute of Medicine published their recommendations regarding the ethical issues raised by advances in genetics. One of the Committee's recommendation was to inform women when test results revealed misattributed paternity, but not to disclose this information to the women's partners. The Committee's reason for withholding such information was that “'genetic testing should not be used in ways that disrupt families”. In this paper, I argue that the Committee's conclusion in favour of nondisclosure to the male partner is unethical. I argue that both parties ought to be informed

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,061

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Deceitful Non-Disclosure and Misattributed Paternity.Madeline Kilty - 2010 - Australian Journal of Professional and Applied Ethics 11 (1-2).
Paternity fraud and compensation for misattributed paternity.H. Draper - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (8):475-480.
The making and breaking of paternity secrets in donor insemination.L. Turney - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (7):401-406.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
105 (#207,739)

6 months
12 (#217,381)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lainie Ross
University of Rochester

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references