Behavioral (pico)economics and the brain sciences

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):659-660 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Supporters of Ainslie's model face questions about its integration with neuroscience. Although processes of value estimation may well turn out to be locally implemented, methodological reasons suggest this is less likely in the case of subpersonal “interests.”.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,225

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Really taking metaphysics seriously.Barbara Montero - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (5):632-633.
Agency is realized by subpersonal mechanisms too.Neil Levy - 2018 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 41.
Just how aligned are interlocutors' representations?Michael F. Schober - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):209-210.
Is the challenge for psychologists to return to behaviourism?Denis J. Hilton - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):415-416.
Causation, supervenience, and special sciences.Graham Macdonald - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (5):631-631.
A nemesis for heritability estimation.Jerry Hirsch - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (1):137-138.
Methodological behaviorism: a case for transparent texonomy.David M. Rosenthal - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (1):92-93.
Are emotions so simple?Aaron Ben-Ze'ev - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2):194-194.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
69 (#304,784)

6 months
16 (#187,025)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Don Ross
University College, Cork
David Spurrett
University of KwaZulu-Natal

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references