- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
When Philosophical Argumentation Impedes Social and Political Progress
Journal of Social Philosophy 43 (3):317-333 (2012)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Why We Need Skepticism in Argument: Skeptical Engagement as a Requirement for Epistemic Justice.Lucy Alsip Vollbrecht - 2022 - Argumentation 36 (2):269-285.
Doyle, Phyllis, A History of Political Thought. [REVIEW]Rumney Rumney - 1934 - Studies in Philosophy and Social Science 3:103.
Gray’s Elegy for Progress.Glyn Morgan - 2006 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 9 (2):227-241.
Beauty in Thinking — Aesthetic Character of Chinese Argumentation.Wu Kuang-Ming - 1997 - Dialogue and Universalism 7 (3):37-49.
The Clash of Progress and Security. [REVIEW]Konrad Bekker - 1937 - Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung 6 (3):725-727.
Society and Medieal Progress. [REVIEW]Arturo Castiglioni - 1941 - Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung 9 (3):532-533.
Problem of public progress in philosophy of a history of N. I. Kareev.B. Shlyahov - 2011 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 1 (21):39-47.
Kant and the Possibility of Progress: From Modern Hopes to Postmodern Anxieties.Samuel Stoner & Paul Wilford (eds.) - 2021 - Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Analytics
Added to PP
2012-09-03
Downloads
106 (#198,456)
6 months
8 (#549,811)
2012-09-03
Downloads
106 (#198,456)
6 months
8 (#549,811)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Aggression, Politeness, and Abstract Adversaries.Catherine Hundleby - 2013 - Informal Logic 33 (2):238-262.
Feminist Perspectives on Argumentation.Catherine E. Hundleby - 2021 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Who’s Afraid of Adversariality? Conflict and Cooperation in Argumentation.Catarina Dutilh Novaes - 2020 - Topoi 40 (5):873-886.
“Don’t Let Your Mouth”: On Argumentative Smothering Within Academia.Tempest M. Henning - 2021 - Topoi 40 (5):913-924.
References found in this work
Epistemic injustice: power and the ethics of knowing.Miranda Fricker - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Philosophy, Adversarial Argumentation, and Embattled Reason.Phyllis Rooney - 2010 - Informal Logic 30 (3):203-234.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-f8568656d-snkrx uwo