Kant, Aesthetic Ideas and Originality

Southwest Philosophy Review 22 (1):209-215 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

08972346

DOI

10.5840/swphilreview200622122

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,394

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Was Everything Beautiful for Kant: Commentary on Kenneth Rogerson.Hoke Robinson - 2003 - Southwest Philosophy Review 19 (2):65-66.
Comment on Kenneth Brewer’s “Fashion and the Judgment of Taste”.E. M. Dadlez - 2019 - Southwest Philosophy Review 35 (2):23-26.
Kenneth Laine Ketner, Ed., Peirce and Contemporary Thought: Philosophical Inquiries. [REVIEW]Robert Levy - 1996 - Southwest Philosophy Review 12 (2):237-240.
Comments on “Aesthetic Reasons and Aesthetic Shoulds”.J. Harrison Lee - 2021 - Southwest Philosophy Review 37 (2):17-20.
On ‘Obscenity and Aesthetic Value’.Joseph Bien - 2010 - Southwest Philosophy Review 26 (2):51-53.
Hume's Aesthetic Realism.S. K. Wertz - 2006 - Southwest Philosophy Review 22 (2):53-61.
Kant and Clint.Darian C. De Bolt - 1997 - Southwest Philosophy Review 13 (1):21-28.
Concepts and Ideas.Hoke Robinson - 2006 - Southwest Philosophy Review 22 (2):139-142.
American Ruins, Aesthetic Responses, and Speculations.James Mock - 2020 - Southwest Philosophy Review 36 (1):179-185.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
54 (#401,053)

6 months
10 (#410,099)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kenneth F. Rogerson
Florida International University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references