Anselm on Freedom

Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Can human beings be free and responsible if there is an all-powerful God? Anselm of Canterbury offers viable answers to questions which have plagued religious people for at least two thousand years. Katherin Rogers examines Anselm's reconciliation of human free will and divine omnipotence in the context of current philosophical debates.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,607

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Anselm on Freedom. [REVIEW]Thomas Williams - 2009 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009.
Katherin Rogers, Anselm on freedom.Janine Marie Idziak - 2009 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 65 (3):171-175.
Katherin A. Rogers, Anselm on Freedom Reviewed by.Michael W. Tkacz - 2010 - Philosophy in Review 30 (3):217-219.
Anselm on Freedom and the Will.Jasper Hopkins - 1983 - Philosophy Research Archives 9:471-493.
Anselm on Freedom and Grace.James A. Gibson - 2014 - Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion 5:88-121.
Anselm on Freedom. [REVIEW]Hugh J. McCann - 2011 - Faith and Philosophy 28 (4):456-460.
Anselm on Freedom. [REVIEW]Montague Brown - 2010 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 84 (4):829-832.
Anselm on Freedom.Kevin M. Staley - 2010 - International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (1):136-139.
Review of Katherin Rogers, Anselm on Freedom[REVIEW]Thomas Williams - 2009 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (2).

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
162 (#142,278)

6 months
14 (#216,207)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Katherin Rogers
University of Delaware

Citations of this work

Tracing and heavenly freedom.Benjamin Matheson - 2018 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 84 (1):57-69.
Philosophy of religion.Charles Taliaferro - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Our inalienable ability to sin: Peter Olivi’s rejection of asymmetrical freedom.Bonnie Kent - 2017 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25 (6):1073-1092.
Voluntary Action and Rational Sin in Anselm of Canterbury.Tomas Ekenberg - 2016 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 24 (2):215-230.

View all 21 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references