The Implications of High-Rate Nanomanufacturing on Society and Personal Privacy

Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 26 (1):38-45 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The growing field of nanotechnology has received considerable attention as of late. The U.S. National Nanotechnology Initiative has committed billions of dollars toward research on the nanoscale, and proponents of nanotechnology claim that its benefits will range from curing cancer to ending poverty. This article takes a look at the possible benefits and problems associated with the development of high-rate nanomanufacturing technologies, specifically in regards to privacy. Nanosensors, small enough to avoid detection by the naked eye and that are produced cheaply enough, could be used as tracking or listening devices. There may be useful applications of such technologies for some defense, intelligence, and medical and industrial purposes; however, widespread availability and abuse of such sensors is a cause for concern. The adequacy of existing legislation concerning technology and privacy is reviewed and possible courses of action for placating any negative effects of nanomanufacturing on personal privacy considered.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Nanotechnology, Sensors, and Rights to Privacy.Alan Rubel - 2010 - Public Affairs Quarterly 24 (2):131-153.
Nanotechnology and Privacy.Jeroen van den Hoven - 2006 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 20 (2):215-228.
Privacy in the shadow of nanotechnology.Chris Toumey - 2007 - NanoEthics 1 (3):211-222.
Environment.Fritz Allhoff, Patrick Lin & Daniel Moore - 2009 - In Fritz Allhoff, Patrick Lin & Daniel Moore (eds.), What is Nanotechnology and Why Does It Matter: From Science to Ethics. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 151–169.
Privacy preserving or trapping?Xiao-yu Sun & Bin Ye - forthcoming - AI and Society:1-11.
Lilliputian Computer Ethics.John Weckert - 2002 - Metaphilosophy 33 (3):366-375.
Privacy Perception of Adolescents in a Digital World.Anat Cohen & Tal Soffer - 2014 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 34 (5-6):145-158.
Engines of Second Creation: Stories About Nanotechnology.Ashley Shew - 2013 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 33 (1-2):21-27.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-27

Downloads
11 (#1,423,075)

6 months
5 (#1,053,842)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Privacy in the shadow of nanotechnology.Chris Toumey - 2007 - NanoEthics 1 (3):211-222.
Nanotechnology and Social Context.Ronald Sandler - 2007 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 27 (6):446-454.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references