On the So‐Called War on Terrorism

Metaphilosophy 35 (3):386-401 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Since the terrorist attacks on the United States in September 2001, the country has embarked on a so‐called war on terrorism. This essay argues that so‐called war on terrorism has used the pretext of responding to terrorist attacks in the U.S. in September 2001 to wage wars in Afghanistan and Iraq that have objectives other than stamping out terrorism. It further argues that war requires a moral justification that cannot be provided for either the war in Afghanistan or the war in Iraq.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,824

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
68 (#340,690)

6 months
11 (#343,272)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tom Rockmore
Duquesne University

Citations of this work

The senses of terrorism.Mark Rigstad - 2008 - Review Journal of Political Philosophy 6:1-36.
The 'Bush Doctrine' as a Hegemonic Discourse Strategy.Mark Rigstad - 2009 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy.
The ‘Bush Doctrine’ as a hegemonic discourse strategy.Mark Rigstad - 2009 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 12 (3):377-398.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references