The Role of Causation in Decision of Tort Law

Journal of Law, Development and Politics 1 (2) (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Tort law depends on three key concepts: causation, responsibility, and fault. However, I argue that the three key concepts are neither necessary, nor sufficient, for tort.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Philosophy of Tort Law.Izhak Englard - 1993 - Dartmouth Publishing Company.
Corrective Justice and Personal Responsibility in Tort Law.Allan Beever - 2008 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 28 (3):475-500.
Mens Rea in tort law.Cane Peter - 2000 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 20 (4):533-556.
Causation and the goals of tort law.Donal Nolan - 2009 - In Andrew Robertson & Hang Wu Tang (eds.), The goals of private law. Portland, Or.: Hart.
Necessary and sufficient conditions in tort law.Tony Honore - 1995 - In David G. Owen (ed.), Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law. Oxford University Press. pp. 363--385.
Tort Law and Social Morality.Peter M. Gerhart - 2010 - Cambridge University Press.
Testing for Causation in Tort Law.D. A. Coady - 2002 - Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 27 (1):1-10.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-02-09

Downloads
736 (#34,136)

6 months
106 (#56,438)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Robinson
University of West Florida

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references