Defining literacy: Paradise, nightmare or red herring?

British Journal of Educational Studies 43 (4):412-432 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the past fifty years, hundreds of definitions of 'literacy' have been advanced by scholars, adult literacy workers, and programme planners. This paper analyses three major approaches to the problem of defining literacy: quantitative, qualitative and pluralist. The pluralist perspective, while not without its difficulties, appears to have the most to offer in understanding literacy in the contemporary world.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,880

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cavell, literacy and what it means to read.Amanda J. Fulford - 2009 - Ethics and Education 4 (1):43-55.
A Critical Discussion of the ‘New Literacy Studies’.Kate Stephens - 2000 - British Journal of Educational Studies 48 (1):10-23.
Adult Literacy and Broadcasting: The BBC's Experience.David Hargreaves - 1981 - British Journal of Educational Studies 29 (2):178-180.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
54 (#405,619)

6 months
12 (#317,477)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Pedagogy of the oppressed.Paulo Freire - 2004 - In David J. Flinders & Stephen J. Thornton (eds.), The Curriculum Studies Reader. Routledge.
Pedagogy of the Oppressed.Paulo Freire - 1970 - New York: Bloomsbury Academic. Edited by Myra Bergman Ramos, Donaldo P. Macedo & Ira Shor.
The language of education.Israel Scheffler - 1960 - Springfield, Ill.,: Thomas.

View all 8 references / Add more references