Decontextualised data IN, decontextualised theory OUT

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):54-55 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We discuss our concerns associated with three assumptions upon which the model of Levelt, Roelofs & Meyer is based: assumed generalisability of decontextualised experimental programs, assumed highly modular architecture of the language production systems, and assumed symbolic computations within the language production system. We suggest that these assumptions are problematic and require further justification

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,449

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Syntactic representation in the lemma stratum.Holly P. Branigan & Martin J. Pickering - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):296-297.
Binding, attention, and exchanges.Gary S. Dell, Victor S. Ferreira & Kathryn Bock - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):41-42.
Prosody and word production.Fernanda Ferreira - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):43-44.
Compositional semantics and the lemma dilemma.Marco Zorzi & Gabriella Vigliocco - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):60-61.
Sharpening ockham's razor.Anne Cutler & Dennis Norris - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):40-41.
Is Pain Modular?Laurenz Casser & Sam Clarke - 2022 - Mind and Language 38 (3):828-46.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
35 (#678,037)

6 months
12 (#218,371)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Sidestepping the semantics of “consciousness”.Michael V. Antony - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):289-290.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references