Classifications of Supposition in Medieval Logic

Tulane Studies in Philosophy 5:79-86 (1956)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

00826766

DOI

10.5840/tulane195655

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,795

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Tulane Studies in Philosophy, Vol. V. [REVIEW]R. P. - 1957 - Review of Metaphysics 10 (4):727-728.
Tulane Studies in Philosophy, Vol. VI, Studies in Ethics. [REVIEW]J. S. A. - 1958 - Review of Metaphysics 11 (4):698-698.
Every Proposition Is False — A Medieval Paradox.Louise Nisbet Roberts - 1953 - Tulane Studies in Philosophy 2:95-102.
Notes on a Past Logic of Time.Louise N. Roberts - 1967 - Tulane Studies in Philosophy 16:123-128.
Philosophical Logic and Psychological Satisfaction.Donald H. Weiss - 1967 - Tulane Studies in Philosophy 16:153-161.
The Logic of Our Language.Robert L. Arrington - 1967 - Tulane Studies in Philosophy 16:1-17.
Cultural Relativity and the Logic of Philosophy.James W. Dye - 1967 - Tulane Studies in Philosophy 16:37-52.
Formalism of Terminist Logic in the Fourteenth Century.Louise Nisbet - 1952 - Tulane Studies in Philosophy 1:107-112.
The Pernicious Distinction Between Logic and Psychology.Donald S. Lee - 1964 - Tulane Studies in Philosophy 13:44-49.
Ockham's supposition theory and modern logic.Gareth B. Matthews - 1964 - Philosophical Review 73 (1):91-99.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
73 (#289,543)

6 months
18 (#166,979)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references