Commentary

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 11 (4):428-430 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This case compellingly directs us to two challenging issues for the patient's care and treatment: Does evidence of a suicide attempt vitiate the force of an advance directive that refuses life support in the face of progressive, irreversible terminal illness? Does it constitute grounds not to honor an otherwise valid proxy directive and the proxy's decision to withdraw life support?

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Commentary: The Problematic Proxy and the Patient’s Best Interests.David Campbell - 2014 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 23 (2):232-234.
Commentary.Robin Lynne Pierucci - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (4):539-539.
Commentary: Whose suffering?Martin Buijsen - 2020 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 29 (3):346-353.
Commentary.John K. Davis - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (4):435-439.
Commentary.Andrew Thurman - 2000 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9 (1):129-130.
Commentary.Howard Klepper - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (2):213-214.
Commentary.David Lowenthal - 2002 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 11 (4):423-425.
Commentary.Ben A. Rich - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (1):100-104.
Commentary.Rosamond Rhodes - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (3):378-380.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
29 (#774,799)

6 months
12 (#296,635)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references