- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Blocking the Routes to Triviality with Depth Relevance
Journal of Logic, Language and Information 23 (4):493-526 (2014)
Abstract
In Rogerson and Restall’s, the “class of implication formulas known to trivialize ” is recorded. The aim of this paper is to show how to invalidate any member in this class by using “weak relevant model structures”. Weak relevant model structures verify deep relevant logics only.Author Profiles
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Curry’s Paradox, Generalized Modus Ponens Axiom and Depth Relevance.Gemma Robles & José M. Méndez - 2014 - Studia Logica 102 (1):185-217.
Curry’s Paradox, Generalized Contraction Rule and Depth Relevance.Francisco Salto, Gemma Robles & José M. Méndez - 2018 - In Konstantinos Boudouris, Proceedings XXIII world Congress Philosophy. Charlottesville: Philosophy Documentation Center. pp. 35-39.
Correction to: A note on functional relations in a certain class of implicative expansions of FDE related to Brady’s 4-valued logic BN4.Gemma Robles & José M. Méndez - 2024 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 32 (3):572-572.
Logic in the deep end.Graham Leach-Krouse, Shay Allen Logan & Blane Worley - 2024 - Analysis 84 (2):282-291.
Topic Transparency and Variable Sharing in Weak Relevant Logics.Thomas Macaulay Ferguson & Shay Allen Logan - forthcoming - Erkenntnis:1-28.
A Lindström-style theorem for finitary propositional weak entailment languages with absurdity.Guillermo Badia - 2016 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 24 (2):115-137.
Completeness of implicational relevant logics.R. Kashima - 2000 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 8 (6):761-785.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-05-31
Downloads
22 (#1,030,498)
6 months
3 (#1,096,948)
2019-05-31
Downloads
22 (#1,030,498)
6 months
3 (#1,096,948)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
What is a Relevant Connective?Shawn Standefer - 2022 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 51 (4):919-950.
Routes to relevance: Philosophies of relevant logics.Shawn Standefer - 2024 - Philosophy Compass 19 (2):e12965.
Relevant first-order logic LP# and Curry’s paradox resolution.Jaykov Foukzon - 2015 - Pure and Applied Mathematics Journal Volume 4, Issue 1-1, January 2015 DOI: 10.11648/J.Pamj.S.2015040101.12.
References found in this work
Relevant Logics and Their Rivals.Richard Routley, Val Plumwood, Robert K. Meyer & Ross T. Brady - 1982 - Ridgeview. Edited by Richard Sylvan & Ross Brady.
Transfinite Cardinals in Paraconsistent Set Theory.Zach Weber - 2012 - Review of Symbolic Logic 5 (2):269-293.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-99fc7d78b-58pt2 uwo