Norms and explanation in the social sciences

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 29 (2):223-237 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/s0039-3681(98)00005-3

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,108

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Three grades of normative involvement: Risjord, Stueber, and Henderson on norms and explanation.Paul A. Roth - 2005 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (3):339-352.
Philosophy of social science from an analytic perspective: Mark Risjord: Philosophy of the social sciences: A contemporary introduction. London: Routledge, 288pp. $44.95 PB, $120 HB.Ian Jarvie - 2016 - Metascience 25 (3):465-467.
Book Review: On Interpretive Social Inquiry. [REVIEW]Theodore Schatzki - 2005 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (2):231-249.
Development and mechanistic explanation.Fabrizzio Mc Manus - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (2):532-541.
Paley’s design argument as an inference to the best explanation, or, Dawkins’ dilemma.Sander Gliboff - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 31 (4):579-597.
Development and mechanistic explanation.Fabrizzio Manus - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (2):532-541.
Conjecture and explanation: A reply to Reydon.Patrick Forber - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (1):298-301.
Introduction: Evolution and historical explanation.Peter Harrison & Ian Hesketh - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 58:1-7.
Functional explanation and the problem of functional equivalence.James DiFrisco - 2017 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 65:1-8.
What was historical about natural history? Contingency and explanation in the science of living things.Peter Harrison - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 58:8-16.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
56 (#400,191)

6 months
8 (#388,706)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark Risjord
Emory University

Citations of this work

Norms, invariance, and explanatory relevance.David Henderson - 2005 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (3):324-338.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Concept of Mind.Gilbert Ryle & Daniel C. Dennett - 1949 - New York: University of Chicago Press.
The scientific image.C. Van Fraassen Bas - 1980 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Inference to the Best Explanation.Peter Lipton - 1991 - London and New York: Routledge.
Truth and Method.H. G. Gadamer - 1975 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 36 (4):487-490.
Intention.Gertrude Elizabeth Margaret Anscombe - 1957 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

View all 19 references / Add more references