Blurring: An Approach to Conflation

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 59 (2):171-188 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I consider the phenomenon of conflation—treating distinct things as one—and develop logical tools for modeling it. These tools involve a purely consequence-theoretic treatment, independent of any proof or model theory, as well as a four-valued valuational treatment.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1215/00294527-2017-0025

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 105,626

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Coordination, Content, and Conflation.Kyle Landrum - 2023 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 101 (3):638-652.
The structure of logical consequence : proof-theoretic conceptions.Ole T. Hjortland - unknown
Vagueness in a Kind of Conflation.David Ripley - 2017 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 26 (1):115-135.
Tarski, Model Theory, and Logical Truth.John William Etchemendy - 1982 - Dissertation, Stanford University
Truth and Proof without Models: A Development and Justification of the Truth-valuational Approach (2nd edition).Hanoch Ben-Yami - manuscript
A fallacy about the modal status of logic.Manuel Ppérez Otero - 2001 - Dialectica 55 (1):9–27.
Logical consequence, proof theory, and model theory.Stewart Shapiro - 2005 - In Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 651--670.
Partial and paraconsistent three-valued logics.Vincent Degauquier - 2016 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 25 (2):143-171.
Inferentialism and Quantification.Owen Griffiths - 2017 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 58 (1):107-113.
Self-Ownership, the Conflation Problem, and Presumptive Libertarianism: Can the Market Model Support Libertarianism Rather than the Other Way Around?Marcus Agnafors - 2015 - Libertarian Papers 7.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-01-25

Downloads
53 (#452,071)

6 months
11 (#332,704)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Ripley
Monash University

Citations of this work

Valuations: Bi, Tri, and Tetra.Rohan French & David Ripley - 2019 - Studia Logica 107 (6):1313-1346.
Identity in Mares-Goldblatt Models for Quantified Relevant Logic.Shawn Standefer - 2021 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 50 (6):1389-1415.
Confused Terms in Ordinary Language.Greg Frost-Arnold & James R. Beebe - 2020 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 29 (2):197-219.
Coordination, Content, and Conflation.Kyle Landrum - 2023 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 101 (3):638-652.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Paradoxes and Failures of Cut.David Ripley - 2013 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (1):139 - 164.
The Runabout Inference-Ticket.A. N. Prior - 1960 - Analysis 21 (2):38-39.
Tolerant, Classical, Strict.Pablo Cobreros, Paul Egré, David Ripley & Robert van Rooij - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (2):347-385.
Theory change and the indeterminacy of reference.Hartry Field - 1973 - Journal of Philosophy 70 (14):462-481.

View all 23 references / Add more references