Trade, Piecework, and the Liberty Principle

Utilitas 36 (3):300-311 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

John Stuart Mill does not contradict himself in On Liberty with respect to the issue of piecework, contrary to Dale E. Miller's charge that he does. Miller fails to understand that the liberty principle (LP) limits society's authority to regulate trade in that society has no legitimate authority to prohibit or make unduly expensive a buyer's post-trade use of his purchased product in self-regarding ways. LP gives an employer who has purchased labor under a trade contract in a free and fair competitive labor market a right to conclude a separate mutually consensual self-regarding piecework contract with any skilled worker already in his employ.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Resolving Mill’s Absolutism Problem.Jonathan Riley - forthcoming - Canadian Journal of Philosophy:1-15.
J.S. Mill and market harms: a response to Endörfer.Ben Saunders - 2024 - Economics and Philosophy 40 (2):462-467.
Mill and the Liberal Rejection of Legal Moralism.Piers Norris Turner - 2015 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 32 (1):79-99.
Rights to Liberty in Purely Private Matters.Jonathan Riley - 1989 - Economics and Philosophy 5 (2):121.
Mill on Freedom of Speech.Daniel Jacobson - 2016 - In Christopher Macleod & Dale E. Miller (eds.), A Companion to Mill. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. pp. 440–453.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-10-12

Downloads
6 (#1,692,869)

6 months
6 (#851,135)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations