Against Sen Against Rawls On Justice

Indian Journal of Human Development 5 (1):211-221 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Amartya Sen has recently leveled a series of what he alleges to be quite serious very general objections against Rawls, Rawlsian fellow travelers, and other social contract accounts of justice. In The Idea of Justice, published in 2009, Sen specifically charges his target philosophical views with what calls transcendentalism, procedural parochialism, and with being mistakenly narrowly focused on institutions. He also thinks there is a basic incoherence—arising from a version of Derek Parfit’s Identity Problem—internal to the Rawslian theoretical apparatus. Sen would have political philosophy pursue intersocietal comparisons of relative justice more directly and in the manner of social choice theory. Yet the positive argument he develops in support of this method is quite thin. That aside, Sen’s polemical strategy of inflicting death by a thousand cuts is ineffective against the Rawlsian paradigm. For, as I show herein, none of these criticisms have the force we might be led to expect.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

In defense of transcendental institutionalism.James Gledhill - 2014 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 40 (7):665-682.
For a Feasible Justice: the Comparative Approach of Amartya Sen.Fábio Creder - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 69:93-97.
Amartya Sen’s nonideal theory.Kristina Meshelski - 2019 - Ethics and Global Politics 12 (2):31-45.
On Sen on comparative justice.Chandran Kukathas - 2013 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (2):196-204.
From primary goods to capabilities to well-being.Richard J. Arneson - 2013 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (2):179-195.
Ideals of justice: goals vs. constraints.Anthony Simon Laden - 2013 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (2):205-219.
Transcendental institutionalism and global justice.Darrel Moellendorf - 2013 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (2):162-178.
Justice Implicit: The Pragmatism of Amartya Sen.Jason Hannan - 2015 - Contemporary Pragmatism 12 (2):317-339.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-08-12

Downloads
1,303 (#13,931)

6 months
135 (#38,473)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Evan Riley
College of Wooster

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references