- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Response to our critics
Biology and Philosophy 23 (2):301-315 (2008)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Response to Our Critics.Alex Voorhoeve, Trygve Ottersen & Ole Frithjof Norheim - 2016 - Health Economics, Policy and Law 11 (1):103-111.
Harm and Parental Permission: A Response to Our Critics.Mark Christopher Navin & Jason Adam Wasserman - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (11):W1-W4.
Robust Intelligibility: Response to Our Critics.Charles Spinosa & Hubert L. Dreyfus - 1999 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 42 (2):177-194.
Conflicts of Interest in Bioethics: A Response to Our Critics.David C. Landy & Richard R. Sharp - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (8):1-2.
Recognition and Redistribution in Aristotle’s Account of Stasis: a Response to Our Critics.Douglas Cairns, Mirko Canevaro & Kleanthis Mantzouranis - 2023 - Polis 40 (3):349-368.
Equipoise and the duty of care in clinical research: A philosophical response to our critics.Paul B. Miller & Charles Weijer - 2007 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (2):117 – 133.
What is Death and Why Do We Insist on the Dead Donor Rule? A Response to Our Critics.Emil J. Busch & Marius T. Mjaaland - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (4):8-12.
Skills, historical disclosing, and the end of history: A response to our critics.Charles Spinosa, Fernando Flores & Hubert Dreyfus - 1995 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 38 (1-2):157 – 197.
Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution, by Peter J. Richerson and Robert Boyd.Stephen Shennan - 2008 - Biology and Philosophy 23 (2):293-299.
Defining and explaining culture (comments on Richerson and Boyd, not by genes alone).Dan Sperber & Nicolas Claidi”ere - 2008 - Biology and Philosophy 23 (2):283-292.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
67 (#317,789)
6 months
5 (#1,071,419)
2009-01-28
Downloads
67 (#317,789)
6 months
5 (#1,071,419)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The cognitive bases of human tool use.Krist Vaesen - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (4):203-262.
Culture and Cognitive Science.Andreas De Block & Daniel Kelly - 2022 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Stochasticity in cultural evolution: a revolution yet to happen.Sylvain Billiard & Alexandra Alvergne - 2017 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 40 (1):9.
Complexity and technological evolution: What everybody knows?Krist Vaesen & Wybo Houkes - 2017 - Biology and Philosophy 32 (6):1245-1268.
References found in this work
Foundations of Human Sociality - Economic Experiments and Ethnographic: Evidence From Fifteen Small-Scale Societies.Joseph Henrich, Robert Boyd, Samuel Bowles, Colin Camerer, Ernst Fehr & Herbert Gintis (eds.) - 2004 - Oxford University Press UK.
The unfolding of language: An evolutionary tour of mankind’s greatest invention.Guy Deutscher - 2005 - Macmillan.
A prolegomenon to nonlinear empiricism in the human behavioral sciences.Charles Efferson & Peter J. Richerson - 2007 - Biology and Philosophy 22 (1):1-33.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-648784bb4d-f5f4x uwo