᾽Εκπύρωσις and the Goodness of God in Cleanthes

Phronesis 50 (1):56 - 78 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The ἐκπύρωσις, or world's conflagration, followed by the restoration of an identical world seems to go against the rationality of the Stoic god. The aim of this paper is to show that Cleanthes, the second head of the School, can avoid this paradox. According to Cleanthes, the conflagration is an inevitable side-effect of the necessary means used by god to sustain the world. Given that this side-effect is contrary to god's sustaining activity, but unavoidable, god's rationality requires the restoration of an identical world once the conflagration subsides. The paper also deals with the relation between Cleanthes and other early Stoics on the topic of conflagration. In particular, Cleanthes' position seems to differ from Chrysippus'. For in contrast with the Cleanthean god, who causes the conflagration as a side-effect only, the Chrysippean god, according to an influential interpretation put forward by Jaap Mansfeld, causes the conflagration as his ultimate cosmological goal

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,458

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
148 (#153,459)

6 months
43 (#106,707)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Providence and the Problem of Evil.Richard Swinburne - 1998 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
Can God Be Free?William L. Rowe - 2003 - Clarendon Press.
Platonic Causes.David Sedley - 1998 - Phronesis 43 (2):114-132.
Can God Be Free?William L. Rowe - 2002 - Faith and Philosophy 19 (4):405-424.

View all 20 references / Add more references