Ball, Philip., Curiosity: How Science Became Interested in Everything

Review of Metaphysics 67 (1):149-150 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,211

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Philip Ball. Curiosity: How Science Became Interested in Everything. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012. Pp. viii+465. $35.00. [REVIEW]Michael Futch - 2014 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 4 (1):186-189.
Kitcher, Philip., The Ethical Project.Philip E. Devine - 2013 - Review of Metaphysics 66 (3):579-581.
If Everything Can Not-Be There Would Be Nothing.Martin J. De Nys - 2002 - Review of Metaphysics 56 (1):99-122.
Devine, Philip E. Natural Law Ethics. [REVIEW]John Goyette - 2001 - Review of Metaphysics 54 (4):914-915.
Why God Became Man. [REVIEW]F. D. D. - 1971 - Review of Metaphysics 24 (4):741-741.
He Became Poor. [REVIEW]Allen B. Moran - 2011 - Review of Metaphysics 64 (3):634-636.
The Scientific Approach. [REVIEW]P. F. K. - 1965 - Review of Metaphysics 18 (3):587-587.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
16 (#1,292,631)

6 months
3 (#1,170,603)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sheldon Richmond
Boston University (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references