Abduction, inference to the best explanation, and Bayesianism: a compatibilist proposal

Metascience:1-4 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s11016-024-01028-x

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,173

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Andrew S. Reynolds, The third lens: metaphor and the creation of modern cell biology, Chicago: the Chicago University Press, 2018.Varsha Nallthambi Tamilkumar - 2023 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 45 (4):1-3.
The role of mathematics in explanation.Bradford Skow - 2024 - Metascience 33 (2):169-171.
Defending abduction.Ilkka Niiniluoto - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (3):451.
What Is Abduction? The Fundamental Problem of Contemporary Epistemology.Jaakko Hintikka - 1998 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 34 (3):503 -.
Metascience builds connections.K. Brad Wray & Lori Nash - 2023 - Metascience 32 (1):1-2.
Pumped up Physicalism. [REVIEW]Katherine Hawley - 2005 - Metascience 14 (2):277-281.
Instructions for Authors - Metascience.[author unknown] - 2004 - Metascience 12 (1):149-152.
Paley’s design argument as an inference to the best explanation, or, Dawkins’ dilemma.Sander Gliboff - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 31 (4):579-597.
Invariance, explanation, and understanding.Paul Humphreys - 2006 - Metascience 15 (1):39-66.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-11-07

Downloads
3 (#1,850,007)

6 months
3 (#1,471,287)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references