- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Scientific truth and the arbitrament of praxis
Noûs 14 (1):59-74 (1980)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Coherentism and Coherence Truth in the Philosophy of Nicholas Rescher.Bryson Brown - 2008 - In Robert Almeder (ed.), Rescher Studies: A Collection of Essays on the Philosophical Work of Nicholas Rescher. De Gruyter. pp. 59-88.
Nicholas Rescher on Scientific Progress: Science in the Face of Limited Cognitive and Technological Resources.Theodor Leiber & Roland Wagner-Döbler - 2008 - In Robert Almeder (ed.), Rescher Studies: A Collection of Essays on the Philosophical Work of Nicholas Rescher. De Gruyter. pp. 363-400.
Nicholas Rescher: Rationalität, Wissenschaft und Praxis. [REVIEW]Kontantin Pollok - 2003 - Philosophischer Literaturanzeiger 56 (2).
How is Scientific Knowledge Economically Possible?: Nicholas Rescher’s Contributions to an Economic Understanding of Science.James R. Wible - 2008 - In Robert Almeder (ed.), Rescher Studies: A Collection of Essays on the Philosophical Work of Nicholas Rescher. De Gruyter. pp. 445-476.
The Coherence Theory of Truth. Nicholas Rescher. [REVIEW]Alex C. Michalos - 1974 - Philosophy of Science 41 (3):298-298.
Nicholas Rescher, ed., Scientific Inquiry in Philosophical Perspectives Reviewed by.Niall Shanks - 1987 - Philosophy in Review 7 (11):461-462.
Les limites à l'avancement de la science selon Nicholas Rescher.Daniel Schulthess - 1981 - In M. Schaffter, M. Borel & P. Muller (eds.), Réflexions en hommage au Professeur Philippe Muller. Editions Messeiller. pp. p.163-183.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
57 (#376,745)
6 months
11 (#345,260)
2009-01-28
Downloads
57 (#376,745)
6 months
11 (#345,260)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
How do Scientists Reach Agreement about Novel Observations?David Gooding - 1986 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 17 (2):205.
Human cloning and the myth of disenchantment.Laurentiu Staicu - 2012 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 11 (31):148-169.
Poincaré's epistemology in the light of Kant: conventions and the regulative use of reason.João Príncipe - 2015 - Scientiae Studia 13 (1):49-72.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54ff658c48-mmr56 uwo