- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Minimalists about truth can (and should) be epistemicists, and it helps if they are revision theorists too
In J. C. Beall & Bradley P. Armour-Garb (eds.), Deflation and Paradox. New York: Oxford University Press (2005)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Minimalists Can (and Should) be Epistemicists, and it helps if they are Revision Theorists Too.G. Restall - 2005 - In J. C. Beall & Bradley P. Armour-Garb (eds.), Deflation and Paradox. New York: Oxford University Press.
LOGIC Greg Restall i.Greg Restall - 2003 - In John Shand (ed.), Fundamentals of Philosophy. New York: Routledge. pp. 64.
Deflation and Paradox.J. C. Beall & Bradley P. Armour-Garb (eds.) - 2005 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Truthmaking and the alleged need for relevance.Adrian Heathcote - 2003 - Logique and Analyse 46 (183-184):345-364.
The deflationists' axioms for truth.Volker Halbach & Leon Horsten - 2005 - In J. C. Beall & Bradley P. Armour-Garb (eds.), Deflation and Paradox. New York: Oxford University Press.
Logical Methods, by Greg Restall and Shawn Standefer. [REVIEW]Jeremiah Joven Joaquin - 2024 - Teaching Philosophy 47 (1):122-126.
Review of J.c.Beall, Greg Restall, Logical Pluralism. [REVIEW]Stephen Read - 2006 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (5).
Naive truth and sophisticated logic.Alan Weir - 2005 - In J. C. Beall & Bradley P. Armour-Garb (eds.), Deflation and Paradox. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 218–249.
Reply to Shawn Standefer, Rohan French, and Greg Restall.Hartry Field - 2020 - Australasian Philosophical Review 4 (2):185-189.
Logical Pluralism, by J. C. Beall and Greg Restall. [REVIEW]Richard Woodward - 2008 - European Journal of Philosophy 16 (2):336-339.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
50 (#441,015)
6 months
4 (#1,264,753)
2009-01-28
Downloads
50 (#441,015)
6 months
4 (#1,264,753)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Conditionals in Theories of Truth.Anil Gupta & Shawn Standefer - 2017 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 46 (1):27-63.
Restricting the T‐schema to Solve the Liar.Jared Warren - 2023 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 108 (1):238-258.
Conceivability, Minimalism and the Generalization Problem.Sergi Oms - 2019 - Dialogue 58 (2):287-297.
References found in this work
Deflationary truth and the liar.Keith Simmons - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (5):455-488.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-648784bb4d-f5f4x uwo