Bioethics and Climate Change: A Response to Macpherson and Valles

Bioethics 30 (8):649-652 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Two articles published in Bioethics recently have explored the ways that bioethics can contribute to the climate change debate. Cheryl Cox Macpherson argues that bioethicists can play an important role in the climate change debate by helping the public to better understand the values at stake and the trade-offs that must be made in individual and social choices, and Sean Valles claims that bioethicists can contribute to the debate by framing the issues in terms of the public health impacts of climate change. While Macpherson and Valles make valid points concerning a potential role for bioethics in the climate change debate, it is important to recognize that much more than ethical analysis and reflection will be needed to significantly impact public attitudes and government policies.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Values in the Economics of Climate Change.Michael Toman - 2006 - Environmental Values 15 (3):365-379.
Pessimism and Optimism in the Debate on Climate Change: A Critical Analysis.Anders Nordgren - 2021 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 34 (4):1-23.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-05-10

Downloads
41 (#538,867)

6 months
3 (#1,464,642)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

DNA Patents and Human Dignity.David B. Resnik - 2001 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 29 (2):152-165.
DNA Patents and Human Dignity.David B. Resnik - 2001 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 29 (1):152-165.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references