Response to “Ethics and Drug Infants” by Michelle Oberman (CQ Vol. 6, No. 2) Points of Variance

, &
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (1):94-96 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We appreciated the important commentary provided by Michelle Oberman on our paper, “Discontinuing Life Support in an Infant of a Drug-Addicted Mother: Whose Decision Is It?” . For the most part we agree with Oberman's analysis of the issues, but there are seven points of variance, either of conception, emphasis, or accuracy. We wish to clarify these and welcome the chance her commentary provided to offer aspects of the social situation surrounding the case we presented

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s096318019800111x

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,314

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Response to “Discontinuing Life Support in an Infant of a Drug Addicted Mother: Whose Decision Is It?” by Renu Jain and David C. Thomasma. [REVIEW]Michelle Oberman - 1997 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 6 (2):235.
Discontinuing Life Support in an Infant of a Drug-Addicted Mother: Whose Decision Is It?Renu Jain & David C. Thomasma - 1997 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 6 (1):48-54.
Response to “Dubious Premises— Evil Conclusions: Moral Reasoning at the Nuremberg Trials” by Edmund D. Pellegrino and David C. Thomasma (CQ Vol 9, No 2). [REVIEW]Michael L. Gross - 2001 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 10 (1):99-102.
Reply to Nelson.David Wasserman & Adrienne Asch - 2007 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (4):478.
Response to special section: ethical decision making and persons with mental retardation (CQ vol. 3, no. 2).J. E. Beltran - 1994 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4 (1):100-102.
Wrong Again—Rejoinder to Annas.Elizabeth Fenton & John D. Arras - 2010 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (1):141.
A Reply to Spital's Concerns.Mary Simmerling & Joel Frader - 2008 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 17 (1):128-130.
Commentary: The Questions We Shouldn’t Ask.Lance Wahlert & Autumn Fiester - 2012 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 21 (2):282-284.
Being There: A Commentary on Göran Hermerén’s “A Future for Migrants with Acute Heart Problems Seeking Asylum?” (CQ 30 (2)). [REVIEW]Inez de Beaufort - 2022 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 31 (1):150-159.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
81 (#278,828)

6 months
11 (#332,132)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references