Legitimizing Scientific Knowledge: An Introduction to Steve Fuller's Social Epistemology

Latham, MD: Lexington Books (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Francis Remedios provides important criticisms of Fuller's position and Fuller's responses to philosophical debates, as well as reconstructions of Fuller's arguments. The result is a carefully argued, in-depth analysis of the work of a very important philosopher of science."--Jacket.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,945

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Book Review. [REVIEW][author unknown] - 2004 - Social Epistemology 18 (4):365-369.
After the Gold Rush: Cleaning Up after Steve Fuller’s Theosis.William T. Lynch - 2018 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 48 (5):505-523.
Steve Fuller's Thomas Kuhn.David Martens - 2003 - Social Epistemology 17 (2-3):225-228.
The normative failure of Fuller's social epistemology.Heidi E. Grasswick - 2001 - Social Epistemology 16 (2):133 – 148.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
65 (#349,598)

6 months
1 (#1,596,857)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Francis X. Remedios
KU Leuven (PhD)

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references