Justice, Civilization, and the Death Penalty: Answering van den Haag

In A. John Simmons, Marshall Cohen, Joshua Cohen & Charles R. Beitz (eds.), Punishment: A Philosophy and Public Affairs Reader. Princeton University Press. pp. 274-308 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

original Reiman, Jeffrey H. (1985) "Justice, civilization, and the death penalty: Answering Van den Haag". Philosophy and Public Affairs 14(2):115-148

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Refuting Reiman and Nathanson.Ernest Haag - 1994 - In A. John Simmons, Marshall Cohen, Joshua Cohen & Charles R. Beitz (eds.), Punishment: A Philosophy and Public Affairs Reader. Princeton University Press. pp. 324-336.
The Death Penalty: For and Against.Jeffrey Reiman & Louis P. Pojman - 1997 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Punishing Criminals. [REVIEW]G. M. - 1977 - Review of Metaphysics 30 (3):538-539.
What is exploitation? Reply to Jeffrey Reiman.John E. Roemer - 1989 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 18 (1):90-97.
Rejoinder to Professor van den Haag.Thomas R. Litwack - 1984 - Criminal Justice Ethics 3 (1):23-26.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-01-25

Downloads
31 (#724,843)

6 months
15 (#202,268)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Penal Disenfranchisement.Christopher Bennett - 2016 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 10 (3):411-425.
Desert, Justice and Capital Punishment.Patrick Lenta & Douglas Farland - 2008 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (3):273-290.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references