Incomplete descriptions

Erkenntnis 37 (3):347 - 363 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Standard attempts to defend Russell's Theory of Descriptions against the problem posed by incomplete descriptions, are discussed and dismissed as inadequate. It is then suggested that one such attempt, one which exploits the notion of a contextually delimited domain of quantification, may be applicable to incomplete quantifier expressions which are typically treated as quantificational: expressions of the form AllF's, NoF's, SomeF's, Exactly eightF's, etc. In this way, one is able to retain the plausible claim that such expressions ought to receive their usual quantificational analyses. The conclusion tentatively drawn is that perhaps definite descriptions arenot amenable to a (Russellian) quantificational analysis.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,636

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
139 (#161,102)

6 months
9 (#502,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marga Reimer
University of Arizona

Citations of this work

The Lying Test.Eliot Michaelson - 2016 - Mind and Language 31 (4):470-499.
Descriptions and Tests for Polysemy.Andrei Moldovan - 2021 - Axiomathes 31 (3):229-249.
Domains of discourse.François Recanati - 1996 - Linguistics and Philosophy 19 (5):445 - 475.

View all 20 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

On Denoting.Bertrand Russell - 1905 - Mind 14 (56):479-493.
On referring.Peter F. Strawson - 1950 - Mind 59 (235):320-344.
Descriptions.Stephen Neale - 1990 - MIT Press.

View all 7 references / Add more references