"Competing" semantic theories

Noûs 31 (4):457-477 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2002

DOI

10.1111/0029-4624.00056

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,795

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Quotation and Demonstration.Ben Caplan - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 111 (1):69-80.
The role of perception in demonstrative reference.Susanna Siegel - 2002 - Philosophers' Imprint 2:1-21.
Why semantic innocence?Graham Oppy - 1992 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 70 (4):445 – 454.
Errata: Meinongian theories and a Russellian paradox.William Rapaport - 1979 - Noûs 13 (1):125.
Reply to Richard and Reimer.Herman Cappelen & Ernie Lepore - 1998 - Mind and Language 13 (4):588-621.
The Semantic View, If Plausible, Is Syntactic.Hans Halvorson - 2013 - Philosophy of Science 80 (3):475-478.
Review of Anne Bezuidenhout (ed.), Marga Reimer (ed.), Descriptions and Beyond. [REVIEW]Gary Ostertag - 2005 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (8).
New waves in philosophy of language.Sarah Sawyer (ed.) - 2009 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
How to be a scientific realist (if at all): a study of partial realism.Dean Peters - 2012 - Dissertation, London School of Economics
Meaningfulness and Contingent Analyticity.Ori Simchen - 2003 - Noûs 37 (2):278–302.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
112 (#192,203)

6 months
15 (#214,286)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marga Reimer
University of Arizona

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references