Constructivism: Can directed mutation improve on classical neural selection?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):574-575 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Quartz & Sejnowski find flaws in standard theories of neural selection, which they propose to repair by introducing Lamarckian mechanisms for anatomical refinement that are analogous to directed mutation in evolution. The reversal of cause and effect that these mechanisms require is no more plausible in an explanation of cognition than it is in an explanation of evolution

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The trade-off between speed and complexity.Mark Andrew Changizi - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (2):203-203.
Neural constructivism: How mammals make modules.Robert A. Barton - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):556-557.
Deconstructing neural constructivism.Olaf Sporns - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):576-577.
Is operant selectionism coherent?François Tonneau & Michel B. C. Sokolowski - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):558-559.
Is cultural evolution Lamarckian?Maria E. Kronfeldner - 2007 - Biology and Philosophy 22 (4):493-512.
Evolution might select constructivism.James Hurford, Sam Joseph, Simon Kirby & Alastair Reid - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):567-568.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
71 (#294,754)

6 months
12 (#289,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references