Are physical properties dispositions?

Philosophy of Science 62 (1):141-149 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Averill (1990) argues that not every property is a disposition. I claim here that his reasoning is faulty, suffering at one point from a logical error and at other points from an inadequate account of counterfactuals.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,302

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Are physical properties dispositions?Edward Wilson Averill - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (1):118-132.
Dispositions.Stephen Mumford - 1998 - Oxford, GB: Clarendon Press.
Dispositions and the Argument from Science.Neil E. Williams - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (1):71 - 90.
Russellian Physicalism and the Causal Relevance of Consciousness.Staale Gundersen - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 57:57-61.
XIII—Knowing How to Reason Logically.Corine Besson - 2021 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 121 (3):327-353.
Indirect Directness.Jennifer McKitrick - 2017 - Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 10.
Dispositions.Stephen Mumford - 1994 - Cogito 8 (2):141-146.
Superficial Dispositionalism.Lauren Ashwell - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (4):635-653.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
294 (#97,022)

6 months
10 (#281,857)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Counterfactuals.David Lewis - 1973 - Philosophy of Science 42 (3):341-344.
Fact, Fiction, and Forecast.Nelson Goodman - 1955 - Philosophy 31 (118):268-269.
In defense of dispositions.D. H. Mellor - 1974 - Philosophical Review 83 (2):157-181.
Are physical properties dispositions?Edward Wilson Averill - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (1):118-132.

Add more references