On Neyman's paradox and the theory of statistical tests

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (3):265-271 (1974)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/bjps/25.3.265

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,290

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Resolving Neyman's paradox.Max Albert - 2002 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (1):69-76.
L ISA M. D OLLING, A RTHUR F. G IANELLI and G LENN N. S TATILE , The Tests of Time: Readings in the Development of Physical Theory. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2003. Pp. xliii+716. ISBN 0-691-09085-8. $25.95. [REVIEW]Stephen Brush - 2006 - British Journal for the History of Science 39 (1):125-126.
Prior Information in Frequentist Research Designs: The Case of Neyman’s Sampling Theory.Adam P. Kubiak & Paweł Kawalec - 2022 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 53 (4):381-402.
On some tests for independence in nonnormal situations: neyman'S C (A) test.K. Kocherlakota & S. Kocherlakota - 1985 - History and Philosophy of Logic 14 (6).
Perspectival realism and frequentist statistics: the case of Jerzy Neyman’s methodology and philosophy.Adam P. Kubiak - 2024 - Synthese 205 (1):1-29.
Perspectival Realism and Frequentist Statistics: The Case of Jerzy Neyman’s Methodology and Philosophy.Adam P. Kubiak - unknown
Review. From physics to metaphysics. Michael Redhead.Peter Forrest - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (1):149-150.
Statistical Mechanics. J. E. Mayer, M. G. Mayer.John M. Reiner - 1941 - Philosophy of Science 8 (1):135-136.
Talal A. Debs;, Michael L. G. Redhead. Objectivity, Invariance, and Convention: Symmetry in Physical Science. xii + 194 pp., figs., apps., index. Cambridge, Mass./London: Harvard University Press, 2007. $39.95. [REVIEW]Richard Healey - 2007 - Isis 98 (4):884-885.
David Miller. A paradox of information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 1 , pp. 59–61. - Karl R. Popper. A comment on Miller's new paradox of information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 1 , pp. 61–69. - Karl R. Popper. A paradox of zero information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 141–143. - J. L. Mackie. Miller's so-called paradox of information.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 144–147. - David Miller. On a so-called so-called paradox: a reply to Professor J. L. Mackie.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 147–149. - Jeffrey Bub and Michael Radner. Miller's paradox of information.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 19 no. 1 , pp. 63–67. - David Miller. The straight and narrow rule of induction: a reply to Dr Bub and Mr Radner.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 19 no. 2, pp. 145. [REVIEW]Richard C. Jeffrey - 1970 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (1):124-127.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
74 (#280,085)

6 months
16 (#178,571)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Entropy - A Guide for the Perplexed.Roman Frigg & Charlotte Werndl - 2011 - In Claus Beisbart & Stephan Hartmann (eds.), Probabilities in Physics. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 115-142.
Theories of probability.Colin Howson - 1995 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (1):1-32.
Resolving Neyman's paradox.Max Albert - 2002 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (1):69-76.
Die Falsifikation Statistischer Hypothesen/The falsification of statistical hypotheses.Max Albert - 1992 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 23 (1):1-32.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Foundations of science.Norman Robert Campbell - 1920 - New York,: Dover Publications.
Has Mendel's work been rediscovered?R. Fisher - 1936 - Annals of Science 1 (2):115-137.
A falsifying rule for probability statements.Donald A. Gillies - 1971 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 22 (3):231-261.
On the infirmities of Gillies's rule.Stephen Spielman - 1974 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (3):261-265.
A comment on Gillies's falsifying rule for probability statements.J. De Maré - 1972 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 23:335.

View all 6 references / Add more references