The double helix 50 years on: models, metaphors, and reductionism

Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (2):63-64 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Bioethics should update its conception of the geneThe 25th of April marks the 50th anniversary of the publication in Nature of the letter by James Watson and Francis Crick announcing their solution to the structure of deoxyribose nucleic acid .1 By that time, much was known about the role of chromosomes in inheritance, the contribution of DNA to chromosome structure, and the chemistry of DNA.2 The gene concept itself was also well established by then; the principal scientific problem became to specify what genes were in molecular terms and how they functioned in the cell during ordinary function and cell division.The importance of the solution of the structure of DNA was twofold. First, it gave insight into finding a mechanism for DNA replication, as the authors recognised in this famous sentence:"It has not escaped our notice that the specific pairing we have postulated immediately suggests a copying mechanism for the genetic material.3 … "

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
40 (#561,410)

6 months
11 (#345,260)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Gene concepts and Genethics: Beyond exceptionalism.Péter Kakuk - 2008 - Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3):357-375.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The concept of information in biology.John Maynard Smith - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (2):177-194.
The question not asked: The challenge of pleiotropic genetic tests.Robert Samuel Wachbroit - 1998 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8 (2):131-144.
Development aid: on ontogeny and ethics.Tim Lewens - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 33 (2):195-217.

Add more references