Presupposition and objectivity in history

Philosophy of Science 7 (4):499-505 (1940)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The sub-title of this essay might very well be: “A Study in the Biology and Mechanics of Historical Research and Interpretation”. A study in biology because historians can be divided into two classes: invertebrates and vertebrates. The invertebrate historians are those who have inarticulate major premises; the vertebrate historians are those having articulate major premises. A study in mechanics because analysis of historical thought reveals that the principle of least action holds literal sway so far as many historians' critical awareness of their assumptions is concerned.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,302

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

History and historians in the twentieth century.Peter Burke (ed.) - 2002 - New York: Published for the British Academy by Oxford University Press.
Historians and Their Duties.Jonathan Gorman - 2004 - History and Theory 43 (4):103-117.
A history of the future.David J. Staley - 2002 - History and Theory 41 (4):72–89.
Telling stories.Aileen Fyfe & Paul Smith - 2003 - British Journal for the History of Science 36 (4):471-476.
Hayden white's appeal to the historians.F. R. Ankersmit - 1998 - History and Theory 37 (2):182–193.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
67 (#327,291)

6 months
15 (#168,777)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references