Meinongian theories and a Russellian paradox

Noûs 12 (2):153-180 (1978)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay re-examines Meinong's "Über Gegenstandstheorie" and undertakes a clarification and revision of it that is faithful to Meinong, overcomes the various objections to his theory, and is capable of offering solutions to various problems in philosophy of mind and philosophy of language. I then turn to a discussion of a historically and technically interesting Russell-style paradox (now known as "Clark's Paradox") that arises in the modified theory. I also examine the alternative Meinong-inspired theories of Hector-Neri Castañeda and Terence Parsons.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
136 (#162,777)

6 months
13 (#253,178)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William J. Rapaport
State University of New York, Buffalo

Citations of this work

Presentism, eternalism, and the growing block.Kristie Miller - 2013 - In Adrian Bardon & Heather Dyke (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Time. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 345-364.
Properties.Francesco Orilia & Michele Paolini Paoletti - 2020 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Nonexistent objects.Maria Reicher - 2019 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 86 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references