What Would Justice Blackmun Say? A Response to Dobbs

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 51 (3):468-472 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Dobbs appears more extreme when juxtaposed against Roe’s hidden history. Justice Blackmun was the author of Roe, but the opinion was the product of a remarkable collaboration that incorporated the suggestions of many Justices. Thus, Roe’s medical framing embodied the vision of the Court as a whole, not one individual.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

INTRODUCTION: Securing Reproductive Justice After Dobbs.Aziza Ahmed, Nicole Huberfeld & Linda C. McClain - 2023 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 51 (3):463-467.
Justice Blackmun and the Right to Medical Privacy.Larry Gostin - 1987 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 15 (4):171-173.
The Dobbs Decision: Can It Be Justified by Public Reason?Leonard M. Fleck - 2023 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 32 (3):310-322.
Protecting Health after Dobbs.Brietta R. Clark - 2022 - Hastings Center Report 52 (6):6-7.
(Re)criminalizing Abortion: Returning to the Political with Stories.George J. Annas - 2023 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 51 (3):480-484.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-12-14

Downloads
23 (#939,354)

6 months
8 (#580,966)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references