Is the Tobacco Settlement Constitutional?

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (4):748-752 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In August 2005, the Competitive Enterprise Institute, a conservative “think tank” and advocacy organization, filed a lawsuit in the Federal District Court for the Western District of Louisiana against the Louisiana Attorney General challenging the legality of the 1998 Master Settlement Agreement. If successful, this lawsuit could lead to the unraveling of one of the most significant opportunities to improve public health in United States history.Under the MSA, forty-six states agreed to end their litigation against the four largest tobacco companies in the United States, who in turn agreed to pay the states an estimated $206 billion. The CEI alleges that the MSA is unconstitutional. Specifically, the suit alleges that the MSA established a cartel under which the states receive monetary payments and the four major tobacco companies are insulated from price competition – and that this arrangement violates the Compact Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

United States: Protecting Commercial Speech under the First Amendment.Jennifer L. Pomeranz - 2022 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 50 (2):265-275.
The Importance of Arguing as We Believe.Adam Kadlac - 2011 - Public Affairs Quarterly 25 (1):63-80.
A Globalized Theory of Public Health Law.David P. Fidler - 2002 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 30 (2):150-161.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-31

Downloads
36 (#626,850)

6 months
9 (#482,469)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references