Debating the State of Philosophy [Book Review]

Dialogue 38 (4):890-893 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The more tangible and prominent theme of the debate central to this book—relativism and the place of absolutes and transcendental conditions in the philosophical vocabulary—is tied to a deeper, though equally evident, concern with the relation between theory and practice. This is understandable. For if philosophy is to be more than merely reflective—if it is also to be practical—it must recognize the concrete historical and cultural conditions under which it operates. And this recognition makes the quest for eternal truths and enduring values problematic.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,795

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Debating the state of philosophy.Jürgen Habermas - 1996 - Westport, Conn.: Praeger. Edited by Richard Rorty, Leszek Kołakowski, Józef Niżnik & John T. Sanders.
Debating the State of Philosophy. [REVIEW]Richard Rumana - 1998 - Teaching Philosophy 21 (4):414-416.
Pragmatism and Practical Philosophy.Scot David Yoder - 1999 - Dissertation, Michigan State University
The fate of transcendental reasoning in contemporary philosophy.James Chase & Jack Reynolds - 2010 - In James Williams, Edwin Mares, James Chase & Jack Reynolds (eds.), Postanalytic and Metacontinental: Crossing Philosophical Divides. New York: Continuum.
On the Domain of Metaphilosophy.Bob Plant - 2017 - Metaphilosophy 48 (1-2):3-24.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-25

Downloads
20 (#1,050,317)

6 months
4 (#1,272,377)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references