Socrates/Thrasymachus: The Extent of Their Agreement

Polis 17 (1-2):79-90 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Socrates' position in the Republic is usually opposed to the position taken by Thrasymachus, and with good reason. Still, there may be some value in recognizing the extent of their agreement. Both men see clearly what is going on in Athens. Thrasymachus, however, sees no further: this is the way things are, and there is nothing to indicate that they will ever get better. Socrates accepts Thrasymachus' factual statements. Indeed, he has little choice but to accept them, especially if he is to head off the criticism that his account bears no relation to the real world, or to the reality that most people, including Thrasymachus, see. To move beyond Thrasymachus' description of what is, Socrates must find a way to convert the question from one of fact to one of value. Only then will he be in a position to ‘persuade those who will listen’

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,458

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-01

Downloads
26 (#853,893)

6 months
5 (#1,043,573)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Un monde sans pitié.Arnaud Macé - 2008 - Philosophie Antique 8:33-60.
Thrasymachus of Chalcedon on the Platonic stage.Dorota Zygmuntowicz - 2019 - Journal of Ancient Philosophy 13 (1):1-39.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Natural Right and History (Chicago, 1953).Leo Strauss - 1953 - The Correspondence Between Ethical Egoists and Natural Rights Theorists is Considerable Today, as Suggested by a Comparison of My" Recent Work in Ethical Egoism," American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (2):1-15.

Add more references