The Significance of Personal Identity for Death

Bioethics 29 (9):681-682 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I respond to David Shoemaker's arguments for the conclusion that personal identity is irrelevant for death. I contend that we can accept Shoemaker's claim that loss of personal identity is not sufficient for death while nonetheless maintaining that there is an important theoretical relationship between death and personal identity. I argue that this relationship is also of practical importance for physicians' decisions about organ reallocation.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,795

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytic Philosophy And Death: Brain Death And Personal Identity.Maurizio Salvi - 1996 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 6 (5):123-124.
John locke on personal identity.N. Nimbalkar - 2011 - Mens Sana Monographs 9 (1):268.
Locke on Personal Identity: A Response to the Problems of His Predecessors.Ruth Boeker - 2017 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 55 (3):407-434.
Practical Identity.Benjamin Matheson - 2017 - In Benjamin Matheson & Yujin Nagasawa (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of the Afterlife. London: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 391-411.
Personal identity and bioethics: The state of the art.David Shoemaker - 2010 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 31 (4):249-257.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-07-15

Downloads
134 (#165,848)

6 months
11 (#362,865)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Duncan Purves
University of Florida

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references