Engineering Perfection: Solidarity, Disability, and Well-being

Lexington Books (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Advances in biotechnologies for human enhancement and designer babies appear to offer us new hope in medicine, but capitalism may incentivize the selection of traits for profit. Engineering Perfection: Solidarity, Disability, and Well-being offers an opposing Marxist view, one that embraces human vulnerability and embodied difference.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,173

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Disabled Bodies and Norms of Flourishing in the Human Engineering Debate.Tom Sparrow - 2018 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 11 (2):36-62.
Disability, Ideology, and Quality of Life: A Bias in Biomedical Ethics.Ron Amundson - 2005 - In David Wasserman, Jerome Bickenbach & Robert Wachbroit (eds.), Quality of Life and Human Difference: Genetic Testing, Health Care, and Disability. Cambridge University Press. pp. 101-24.
A Symmetrical View of Disability and Enhancement.Stephen M. Campbell & David Wasserman - 2020 - In Adam Cureton & David Wasserman (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Disability. Oxford University Press. pp. 561-79.
The Ethics of Genetic Engineering.Mark F. Neunder - 2001 - Dissertation, University of Miami
Disability, Transition Costs, and the Things That Really Matter.Tommy Ness & Linda Barclay - 2023 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 48 (6):591-602.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-08-03

Downloads
24 (#906,477)

6 months
3 (#1,471,287)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Elyse Purcell
State University of New York, Oneonta

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references