Indirect speech and extensionality

Philosophical Studies 15 (3):35 - 40 (1964)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf00420775

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,945

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

L. Jonathan Cohen. Why do Cretans have to say so much?Philosophical studies , vol. 12 , pp. 72–78. - A. N. Prior. Indirect speech again. Philosophical studies , vol. 14 , pp. 12–15. - L. Jonathan Cohen. Indirect speech: A rejoinder to Prof. A. N. Prior. Philosophical studies , vol. 14 , pp. 15–18. - A. N. Prior. Indirect speech and extensionality. Philosophical studies , vol. 15 , pp. 35–38. - L. Jonathan Cohen. Indirect speech: A further rejoinder to Professor Prior. Philosophical studies , vol. 15 , pp. 38–40. [REVIEW]S. Kanger - 1968 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 32 (4):550-550.
Indirect speech: A rejoinder to prof. A. N. prior. [REVIEW]L. Jonathan Cohen - 1963 - Philosophical Studies 14 (1-2):15 - 18.
Prior and Davidson on indirect speech.Thomas Baldwin - 1982 - Philosophical Studies 42 (2):255 - 282.
Indirect speech: A further rejoinder to professor prior.L. Jonathan Cohen - 1964 - Philosophical Studies 15 (3):38-40.
Indirect speech again.A. N. Prior - 1963 - Philosophical Studies 14 (1-2):12 - 15.
Prior and Cresswell on indirect speech.B. H. Slater - 1989 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 67 (1):25 – 36.
Parataxis.Adam Sennet - 2013 - In Ernie Lepore & Kurt Ludwig, Blackwell Companion to Donald Davidson. Blackwell. pp. 191–207.
Review of Peter Hanks, Propositional Content, Oxford University Press, 2015. [REVIEW]Andreas Stokke - 2016 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2.
Supervaluationism, Indirect Speech Reports, and Demonstratives.Rosanna Keefe - 2010 - In Richard Dietz & Sebastiano Moruzzi, Cuts and clouds: vagueness, its nature, and its logic. New York: Oxford University Press.
Are there indirect speech acts.Rod Bertolet - 1994 - In Savas L. Tsohatzidis, Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives. Routledge. pp. 335--349.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
42 (#581,669)

6 months
9 (#425,688)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Do linguistic acts make me tired?Virgil C. Aldrich - 1964 - Philosophical Studies 15 (3):40 - 44.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Indirect speech again.A. N. Prior - 1963 - Philosophical Studies 14 (1-2):12 - 15.

Add more references