Hermann Cohen and the Hegelian interpretation of differential calculus

Ideas Y Valores 73 (185):27-45 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper we compare the interpretation of the differential calculus that Hegel proposes in the Science of Logic with that which Cohen develops in The Principle of the Infinitesimal Method and its History and in the second edition of the Kantian Theory of Experience. Although both philosophers find in the calculus the founding qualitative principle of the quantitative, Cohen argues that Hegel does not solve the problem of the relation between mathematics and natural science.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,388

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hermann Cohen’s Principle of the Infinitesimal Method: A Defense.Scott Edgar - 2020 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 10 (2):440-470.
The Role of Mathematics in Deleuze’s Critical Engagement with Hegel.Simon Duffy - 2009 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (4):563 – 582.
Infinitesimal method and judgment of origin.Hernán Pringe - 2021 - Kant E-Prints 16 (2):185-199.
Schizo‐Math.Simon Duffy - 2004 - Angelaki 9 (3):199 – 215.
Acts of Time: Cohen and Benjamin on Mathematics and History.Julia Ng - 2017 - Paradigmi. Rivista di Critica Filosofica 2017 (1):41-60.
Hermann Cohen on Kant, Sensations, and Nature in Science.Charlotte Baumann - 2019 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 57 (4):647-674.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-12-12

Downloads
3 (#1,867,272)

6 months
3 (#1,061,821)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hernán Pringe
Universidad Diego Portales

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations