The empirical claims of maximization theory: A reply to Rachlin and to Kagel, Battalio, and Green

Psychological Review 90 (4):385-389 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/0033-295x.90.4.385

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,880

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Economic Choice Theory: An Experimental Analysis of Animal Behavior, John H. Kagel, Raymond C. Battalio, and Leonard Green. Cambridge University Press, 1995, xii + 230 pages. [REVIEW]Paul Weirich - 1999 - Economics and Philosophy 15 (2):295.
How to decide between matching and maximizing: A reply to Prelec.Howard Rachlin - 1983 - Psychological Review 90 (4):376-379.
The role of memory in stimulus identification: A reply to B. Leshowitz and D. M. Green.William Siegel & Jane A. Siegel - 1974 - Psychological Review 81 (2):180-182.
Postscript: Theory development should not end (but always begins) with good empirical fits: Response to Roberts and Pashler's (2002) reply.Joseph Lee Rodgers & David C. Rowe - 2002 - Psychological Review 109 (3):603-604.
A response to Prelec.Luc Bovens - 2013 - In Adam Oliver (ed.), Essays in Behavioural Public Policy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 228-33.
Refocusing on the data: A reply to Hardman.David W. Green - 1998 - Thinking and Reasoning 4 (1):95 – 96.
Empirical and computational support for context-dependent representations of serial order: Reply to Bowers, Damian, and Davis (2009).Matthew M. Botvinick & David C. Plaut - 2009 - Psychological Review 116 (4):998-1001.
Maximization theory: Some empirical problems.William M. Baum & John A. Nevin - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):389-390.
A resonance theory of "Microvibrations": A reply to Rohracher.James G. L. Williams - 1964 - Psychological Review 71 (6):526-527.
Motor theory of speech perception: A reply to Lane's critical review.Michael Studdert-Kennedy, Alvin M. Liberman, Katherine S. Harris & Franklin S. Cooper - 1970 - Psychological Review 77 (3):234-249.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
16 (#1,207,565)

6 months
7 (#761,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references