Intentional schema will not do the work of a theory of mind

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (1):138-140 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Barresi & Moore's “intentional schema” will not do the work of “theory of mind.” Their model will account neither for fundamental facts of social competence, such as the social attributions of the 10-month-old infant, nor the possibility that, though having a theory of mind, the chimpanzee's theory is “weaker” than the human's.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,337

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Studying the chimpanzee's theory of mind.Gilbert Harman - 1978 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1 (4):576-577.
On the dangers of oversimulation.Gergely Csibra & György Gergely - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (1):127-128.
The prior question: Do human primates have a theory of mind?Robert M. Gordon - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):120-121.
Seeing is not (necessarily) believing.Virginia Slaughter & Linda Mealey - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):130-130.
Theory of mind and other domain-specific hypotheses.C. M. Heyes - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1143-1145.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
35 (#646,056)

6 months
11 (#345,260)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?