The Epideictic Agōn and Aristotle's Elusive Third Genre

American Journal of Philology 133 (2):177-208 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Aristotle's statement that the spectator of epideictic rhetoric judges dynamis ( Rhetoric 1.3, 1358b5-6) is problematic because it seems to direct audience judgment towards the ability of the speaker as opposed to the subject-matter of his speech. I argue that, as a reference to the speaker's ability, the remark indexes the peculiar competitive structure in which speeches of praise and blame are conventionally involved. Thus understood, it is essential to Aristotle's taxonomy of genres and helps resolve the dilemma created by naming the genre of praise and blame after a mode of performance, epideixis, compatible with speeches of any formal description.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
30 (#753,967)

6 months
7 (#718,806)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

On the Threshold of Rhetoric.Jonathan Pratt - 2015 - Classical Antiquity 34 (1):163-182.
The Reason of Rhetoric.Emmanuelle Danblon - 2013 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (4):493-507.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references