Expressivity in polygonal, plane mereotopology

Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (2):822-838 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In recent years, there has been renewed interest in the development of formal languages for describing mereological (part-whole) and topological relationships between objects in space. Typically, the non-logical primitives of these languages are properties and relations such as `x is connected' or `x is a part of y', and the entities over which their variables range are, accordingly, not points, but regions: spatial entities other than regions are admitted, if at all, only as logical constructs of regions. This paper considers two first-order mereotopological languages, and investigates their expressive power. It turns out that these languages, notwithstanding the simplicity of their primitives, are surprisingly expressive. In particular, it is shown that infinitary versions of these languages are adequate to express (in a sense made precise below) all topological relations over the domain of polygons in the closed plane

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Elementary polyhedral mereotopology.Ian Pratt-Hartmann & Dominik Schoop - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (5):469-498.
A Topological Constraint Language with Component Counting.Ian Pratt-Hartmann - 2002 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 12 (3-4):441-467.
A mereotopology based on sequent algebras.Dimiter Vakarelov - 2017 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 27 (3-4):342-364.
Ontologies for Plane, Polygonal Mereotopology.Ian Pratt & Oliver Lemon - 1997 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 38 (2):225-245.
On the expressive power of game sentences.Juha Oikkonen - 1982 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 11 (1-2):40-45.
From finitary to infinitary second‐order logic.George Weaver & Irena Penev - 2005 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 51 (5):499-506.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
79 (#266,139)

6 months
23 (#133,289)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Spatial Reasoning and Ontology: Parts, Wholes, and Locations.Achille C. Varzi - 2007 - In Marco Aiello, Ian Pratt-Hartmann & Johan van Benthem (eds.), Handbook of Spatial Logics. Springer Verlag. pp. 945-1038.
A Canonical Model of the Region Connection Calculus.Jochen Renz - 2002 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 12 (3-4):469-494.
A proof system for contact relation algebras.Ivo Düntsch & Ewa Orłowska - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (3):241-262.
A Topological Constraint Language with Component Counting.Ian Pratt-Hartmann - 2002 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 12 (3-4):441-467.
Full mereogeometries.Stefano Borgo & Claudio Masolo - 2010 - Review of Symbolic Logic 3 (4):521-567.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

A calculus of individuals based on "connection".Bowman L. Clarke - 1981 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 22 (3):204-218.
Region-based topology.Peter Roeper - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (3):251-309.
Point, line, and surface, as sets of solids.Theodore de Laguna - 1922 - Journal of Philosophy 19 (17):449-461.
Individuals and points.Bowman L. Clark - 1985 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 26 (1):61-75.

View all 10 references / Add more references